# CIS Controls v8 8.10 — Retain Audit Logs - Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/8-10-retain-audit-logs - Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [CIS Critical Security Controls v8](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8) › Control 8 — Audit Log Management - Last updated: 2026-06-05 - Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com) **CIS Controls v8**·Control `8.10`·high·Component: **Protect** ## What this control requires > Retain audit logs across enterprise assets for a minimum of 90 days. > > — CIS Controls v8, Control 8.10 ### In plain English Retain audit logs across enterprise assets for a minimum of 90 days. In practice, this means you can prove you retain audit network-level controls on a defined cadence. ## Why it matters The CIS Controls are an industry-vetted, prioritised defence: skipping a safeguard widens the attack surface that the safeguards above and below it assume is closed. Audit frameworks (FedRAMP, PCI DSS, HIPAA) all cite CIS as evidence of due care. This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation. ## What an auditor looks for A CIS-aligned reviewer wants to see (a) which Implementation Group you are targeting, (b) a documented owner for the safeguard, and (c) a tooling or process artefact (config, scan output, ticket) that proves the safeguard runs on the cadence the control demands. Within **Protect**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control 8.10) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles. ## How to implement #### Cloud Posture **CSPM.** Run Wiz / Prisma / Defender for Cloud / Security Command Center over every account; auto-ticket findings above your accepted-risk threshold. #### Configuration Management **Policy-as-code.** Codify the control as Service Control Policies (AWS), Azure Policy initiatives, or Organisation Policy (GCP) so the platform enforces what the document promises. **IaC.** Gate Terraform / Pulumi / CloudFormation changes with Checkov / tfsec / OPA so misconfigurations never reach production. **Drift.** Run a CSPM (Wiz / Prisma / Defender for Cloud / Security Command Center) over every account and route findings to a single risk register. #### Network Security **AWS.** VPC Flow Logs to S3, default-deny security groups, AWS Network Firewall for north-south, and Transit Gateway for hub-and-spoke segmentation. **Azure.** NSGs with deny-by-default, Azure Firewall Premium with TLS inspection, Private Endpoints for PaaS, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud's secure score for drift. **GCP.** VPC Service Controls perimeters around sensitive APIs, Cloud NGFW Enterprise for L7 inspection, Private Service Connect for managed services. ### Operational checklist - **Retain Audit.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Protect.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Scope:** network, logs, enterprise. ## Evidence to collect - **Infra Scan.** Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings. Infrastructure posture tooling (AWS Config, Azure Policy, Nessus) verifies platform hardening. Focus: Retain Audit Logs. ## Common pitfalls - Treating CSPM findings as a backlog instead of a hot queue: findings older than the policy SLA accumulate until the auditor asks why. - Manual cloud-console changes that never make it back to Terraform — drift accumulates until the next outage forces a reconciliation. - Default-allow egress rules; East-West traffic with no segmentation; jump hosts on the public internet with password auth. - Per-account logging that nobody stitches together at the org level — incidents that cross accounts go undetected for days. ## How it maps to other frameworks Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit. - [**NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 AU-9(7)** — Store On Component With Different Operating System](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/au-9-7-store-on-component-with-different-operating-system) - [**NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.4.6** — Least Functionality](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3/3-4-6-least-functionality) - [**BSI C5:2020 OPS-14** — Logging and Monitoring - Storage of the Logging Data](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/bsi-c5-2020/ops-14-logging-and-monitoring-storage-of-the-logging-data) ## Related controls in CIS Controls v8 - [**Control 7.3** — Perform Automated Operating System Patch Management](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/7-3-perform-automated-operating-system-patch-management) - [**Control 10.3** — Disable Autorun and Autoplay for Removable Media](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/10-3-disable-autorun-and-autoplay-for-removable-media) - [**Control 16.8** — Separate Production and Non-Production Systems](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/16-8-separate-production-and-non-production-systems) - [**Control 12.6** — Use of Secure Network Management and Communication Protocols](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/12-6-use-of-secure-network-management-and-communication-protocols) - [**Control 12.8** — Establish and Maintain Dedicated Computing Resources for All Administrative Work](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/12-8-establish-and-maintain-dedicated-computing-resources-for-all-administrative-work) - [**Control 14.2** — Train Workforce Members to Recognize Social Engineering Attacks](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/14-2-train-workforce-members-to-recognize-social-engineering-attacks) ## References - [Center for Internet Security — CIS Controls v8](https://www.cisecurity.org/controls/v8) - Catalogue identifier: `Control 8.10` Topics: governance riskcloud postureconfiguration managementnetwork securitylogging monitoring ## Related compliance guidance - [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Configuration checks like this one are the technical half of a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 programme — the guide shows where they fit, what else an auditor expects, and how to evidence them. - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 compliance: a practical implementation guide](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/iso-27001-2022): ISO 27001 Annex A.8 (technological controls) is where cloud hardening evidence lands; the guide shows how to run the ISMS around it.