# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 MP-6(6) — Media Destruction

- Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/mp-6-6-media-destruction
- Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › MP — Media Protection
- Last updated: 2026-06-05
- Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com)

**NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `MP-6(6)`·high·Component: **Media Protection**

## What this control requires

> Physically destroy media to prevent data reconstruction, using techniques appropriate to the information's security classification for complete eradication. This control supports the Media Destruction capability within the Media Protection family.
> 
> — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control MP-6(6)

### In plain English

Physically destroy media to prevent data reconstruction, using techniques appropriate to the information's security classification for complete eradication. In practice, this means you can prove you policy management-level controls on a defined cadence.

## Why it matters

SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed.

This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.

## What an auditor looks for

A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan.

Within **Media Protection**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control MP-6(6)) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.

## How to implement

#### Policy Management

**Docs.** Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA.

### Operational checklist

-   **Policy.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Information.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Security.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Data.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Protection.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Scope:** management, information, protection, capability, media, techniques, destruction, policy.

## Evidence to collect

-   **Policy Document.** A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document.

Signed policy or standard documents the safeguard. Focus: Media Destruction.

## Common pitfalls

-   Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced.

## How it maps to other frameworks

Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.

-   [**NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.8.4** — Media Marking](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3/3-8-4-media-marking)
-   [**HIPAA (45 CFR Part 164) 164.310(d)(1)** — Device and Media Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/hipaa/164-310-d-1-device-and-media-controls)
-   [**ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.5.1** — Policies for information security](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/iso-27001-2022/a-5-1-policies-for-information-security)
-   [**SOC 2 (2017 TSC) P1.1** — Privacy Notice to Data Subjects](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria/p1-1-privacy-notice-to-data-subjects)
-   [**BSI C5:2020 SP-01** — Documentation, communication and provision of policies and instructions](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/bsi-c5-2020/sp-01-documentation-communication-and-provision-of-policies-and-instructions)

## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5

-   [**Control MP-6(5)** — Classified Information](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/mp-6-5-classified-information)
-   [**Control MP-8** — Media Downgrading](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/mp-8-media-downgrading)
-   [**Control MP-8(3)** — Controlled Unclassified Information](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/mp-8-3-controlled-unclassified-information)
-   [**Control MP-8(4)** — Classified Information](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/mp-8-4-classified-information)
-   [**Control MP-3** — Media Marking](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/mp-3-media-marking)
-   [**Control SC-28(1)** — Cryptographic Protection](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-28-1-cryptographic-protection)

## References

-   [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls)
-   Catalogue identifier: `Control MP-6(6)`

Topics: data protectionpolicy management

## Related compliance guidance

- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs.
- [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement.
- [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.
