# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PL-1 — Policy And Procedures - Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/pl-1-policy-and-procedures - Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › PL — Planning - Last updated: 2026-06-05 - Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com) **NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `PL-1`·high·Component: **Planning** ## What this control requires > This control requires the development, documentation, and dissemination of planning policies and procedures. These policies should address roles, responsibilities, and compliance, while aligning with applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated regularly or after significant events. An organization-defined official is responsible for managing this process. This control supports the Planning Policy Management System capability within the Planning family. > > — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control PL-1 ### In plain English This control requires the development, documentation, and dissemination of planning policies and procedures. In practice, this means you can prove you policy procedures-level controls on a defined cadence. ## Why it matters SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed. This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation. ## What an auditor looks for A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan. Within **Planning**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control PL-1) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles. ## How to implement #### Policy Management **Docs.** Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA. #### Secure Development **Pipeline.** Require code review, SAST (Semgrep / Snyk Code), SCA (Dependabot / Renovate), secret-scanning and IaC scanning in the merge pipeline. **Branch protection.** Protected branches enforce reviews, signed commits and passing CI before merge; document the protection rules as the control evidence. ### Operational checklist - **Policy.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Process.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **System.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Control.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Compliance.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Scope:** procedures, management, organization, system, compliance, events, capability, regulations. ## Evidence to collect - **Policy Document.** A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document. - **Infra Scan.** Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings. Signed policy or standard documents the safeguard. Focus: Policy And Procedures. ## Common pitfalls - Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced. - CI security checks set to warn-only; the merge button is faster than the security feedback. ## How it maps to other frameworks Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit. - [**NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.16.1** — Security Engineering Principles](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3/3-16-1-security-engineering-principles) - [**ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.27** — Secure system architecture and engineering principles](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/iso-27001-2022/a-8-27-secure-system-architecture-and-engineering-principles) - [**HIPAA (45 CFR Part 164) 164.308(a)(5)(ii)(B)** — Security Awareness, Training, and Tools - Protection from Malicious Software](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/hipaa/164-308-a-5-ii-b-security-awareness-training-and-tools-protection-from-malicious-software) ## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 - [**Control SI-1** — Policy And Procedures](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-1-policy-and-procedures) - [**Control SR-1** — Policy And Procedures](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sr-1-policy-and-procedures) - [**Control PL-7** — Concept Of Operations](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/pl-7-concept-of-operations) - [**Control SA-1** — Policy And Procedures](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-1-policy-and-procedures) - [**Control PL-2** — System Security And Privacy Plans](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/pl-2-system-security-and-privacy-plans) - [**Control SC-18(2)** — Acquisition, Development, And Use](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-18-2-acquisition-development-and-use) ## References - [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls) - Catalogue identifier: `Control PL-1` Topics: governance riskpolicy managementsecure development ## Related compliance guidance - [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs. - [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement. - [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.