# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PM-19 — Privacy Program Leadership Role

- Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/pm-19-privacy-program-leadership-role
- Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › PM — Program Management
- Last updated: 2026-06-05
- Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com)

**NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `PM-19`·critical·Component: **Program Management**

## What this control requires

> Appoint a senior agency official for privacy with the authority, mission, accountability, and resources to manage privacy risks and ensure the implementation of privacy requirements through the organization-wide privacy program. This control supports the Governance capability within the Program Management family.
> 
> — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control PM-19

### In plain English

Appoint a senior agency official for privacy with the authority, mission, accountability, and resources to manage privacy risks and ensure the implementation of privacy requirements through the organization-wide privacy program. In practice, this means you can prove you access management-level controls on a defined cadence.

## Why it matters

SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed.

This control is rated **critical** in the source catalogue. Treat gaps here as production incidents in the risk register, not housekeeping.

## What an auditor looks for

A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan.

Within **Program Management**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control PM-19) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.

## How to implement

1.  Write a short policy stating intent, scope and named owner.
2.  Encode it as a platform guardrail — SCP, Azure Policy initiative, Organisation Policy, or repository policy.
3.  Wire a monitoring signal that catches drift (CSPM rule, SIEM rule, scheduled query, Workspace alert) and ticket it.
4.  Review on a documented cadence and capture the review in the risk register or compliance tracker.

### Operational checklist

-   **Access.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Review.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Identity.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Control.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Accountability.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Scope:** management, privacy, mission, organization, identity, review, capability, accountability.

## Evidence to collect

-   **Identity Scan.** IAM / IdP exports — Entra ID, Okta, IAM Identity Center, Workspace directory — showing accounts, roles, MFA state and last sign-in.
-   **Infra Scan.** Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings.

Identity analytics (Okta, SailPoint, Access Analyzer) demonstrates least-privilege. Focus: Privacy Program Leadership Role.

## How it maps to other frameworks

Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.

-   [**CIS Controls v8 6.1** — Establish an Access Granting Process](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/6-1-establish-an-access-granting-process)
-   [**ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.5.16** — Identity management](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/iso-27001-2022/a-5-16-identity-management)
-   [**SOC 2 (2017 TSC) P5.1** — Data Subject Access to Personal Information](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria/p5-1-data-subject-access-to-personal-information)

## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5

-   [**Control PM-2** — Information Security Program Leadership Role](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/pm-2-information-security-program-leadership-role)
-   [**Control PM-20** — Dissemination Of Privacy Program Information](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/pm-20-dissemination-of-privacy-program-information)
-   [**Control PM-1** — Information Security Program Plan](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/pm-1-information-security-program-plan)
-   [**Control IA-8(2)** — Acceptance Of External Authenticators](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/ia-8-2-acceptance-of-external-authenticators)
-   [**Control AT-3(3)** — Practical Exercises](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/at-3-3-practical-exercises)
-   [**Control PM-7** — Enterprise Architecture](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/pm-7-enterprise-architecture)

## References

-   [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls)
-   Catalogue identifier: `Control PM-19`

Topics: governance riskidentity accessidentity managementaccess reviewprivileged accessprivacy management

## Related compliance guidance

- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs.
- [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement.
- [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.
