# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SA-15(2) — Security And Privacy Tracking Tools - Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-15-2-security-and-privacy-tracking-tools - Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › SA — System and Services Acquisition - Last updated: 2026-06-05 - Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com) **NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `SA-15(2)`·high·Component: **System and Services Acquisition** ## What this control requires > Require developers to select and use security and privacy tracking tools during development. These tools support assignment, sorting, filtering, and tracking of work items related to vulnerabilities and privacy tasks. This control supports the Security and Privacy Tracking Framework capability within the System and Services Acquisition family. > > — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control SA-15(2) ### In plain English Require developers to select and use security and privacy tracking tools during development. In practice, this means you can prove you policy management-level controls on a defined cadence. ## Why it matters SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed. This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation. ## What an auditor looks for A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan. Within **System and Services Acquisition**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control SA-15(2)) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles. ## How to implement #### Policy Management **Docs.** Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA. #### Secure Development **Pipeline.** Require code review, SAST (Semgrep / Snyk Code), SCA (Dependabot / Renovate), secret-scanning and IaC scanning in the merge pipeline. **Branch protection.** Protected branches enforce reviews, signed commits and passing CI before merge; document the protection rules as the control evidence. #### Vulnerability Management **Scanners.** Pair an unauthenticated scanner (Nessus / Qualys / Tenable.io) for external surface with an authenticated agent for OS/library CVEs on every host. **SLA.** Document remediation SLAs by CVSS / EPSS: critical 7 days, high 30 days, medium 90 days; report monthly trend to leadership. **Containers.** Scan images in CI (Trivy / Grype / Snyk Container) AND at runtime; block deploys on critical findings without exception. ### Operational checklist - **Policy.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Security.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **System.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Control.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Assignment.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Scope:** management, privacy, system, services, capability, tools, policy, vulnerability. ## Evidence to collect - **Policy Document.** A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document. Signed policy or standard documents the safeguard. Focus: Security And Privacy Tracking Tools. ## Common pitfalls - Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced. - CI security checks set to warn-only; the merge button is faster than the security feedback. - Scans that hit only the perimeter; missing authenticated scans of OS, runtime libs and base images so most CVEs are invisible. ## How it maps to other frameworks Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit. - [**NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.17.3** — Supply Chain Requirements and Processes](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3/3-17-3-supply-chain-requirements-and-processes) - [**ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.29** — Security testing in development and acceptance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/iso-27001-2022/a-8-29-security-testing-in-development-and-acceptance) - [**HIPAA (45 CFR Part 164) 164.308(a)(5)(i)** — Security Awareness and Training](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/hipaa/164-308-a-5-i-security-awareness-and-training) - [**BSI C5:2020 SP-01** — Documentation, communication and provision of policies and instructions](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/bsi-c5-2020/sp-01-documentation-communication-and-provision-of-policies-and-instructions) ## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 - [**Control SA-4(3)** — Development Methods, Techniques, And Practices](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-4-3-development-methods-techniques-and-practices) - [**Control SA-15** — Development Process, Standards, And Tools](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-15-development-process-standards-and-tools) - [**Control SA-11(3)** — Independent Verification Of Assessment Plans And Evidence](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-11-3-independent-verification-of-assessment-plans-and-evidence) - [**Control SA-10(2)** — Alternative Configuration Management Processes](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-10-2-alternative-configuration-management-processes) - [**Control SA-15(6)** — Continuous Improvement](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-15-6-continuous-improvement) - [**Control SA-17** — Developer Security And Privacy Architecture And Design](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-17-developer-security-and-privacy-architecture-and-design) ## References - [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls) - Catalogue identifier: `Control SA-15(2)` Topics: governance riskpolicy managementprivacy managementsecure developmentvulnerability management ## Related compliance guidance - [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs. - [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement. - [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.