# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SA-8(9) — Trusted Components

- Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-8-9-trusted-components
- Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › SA — System and Services Acquisition
- Last updated: 2026-06-05
- Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com)

**NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `SA-8(9)`·high·Component: **System and Services Acquisition**

## What this control requires

> Implement trusted components by ensuring each system element is trustworthy relative to its security role. Evaluate trust dependencies and avoid diminishing system trust through weak subcomponents or misplaced assumptions. This control supports the Trustworthiness Evaluation Module capability within the System and Services Acquisition family.
> 
> — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control SA-8(9)

### In plain English

Implement trusted components by ensuring each system element is trustworthy relative to its security role. In practice, this means you can prove you access management-level controls on a defined cadence.

## Why it matters

SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed.

This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.

## What an auditor looks for

A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan.

Within **System and Services Acquisition**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control SA-8(9)) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.

## How to implement

1.  Write a short policy stating intent, scope and named owner.
2.  Encode it as a platform guardrail — SCP, Azure Policy initiative, Organisation Policy, or repository policy.
3.  Wire a monitoring signal that catches drift (CSPM rule, SIEM rule, scheduled query, Workspace alert) and ticket it.
4.  Review on a documented cadence and capture the review in the risk register or compliance tracker.

### Operational checklist

-   **Access.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Security.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Review.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **System.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Identity.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Scope:** management, system, identity, review, components, services, capability, implement.

## Evidence to collect

-   **Identity Scan.** IAM / IdP exports — Entra ID, Okta, IAM Identity Center, Workspace directory — showing accounts, roles, MFA state and last sign-in.

Identity analytics (Okta, SailPoint, Access Analyzer) demonstrates least-privilege. Focus: Trusted Components.

## How it maps to other frameworks

Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.

-   [**NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.15.2** — System Security Plan](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3/3-15-2-system-security-plan)
-   [**CIS Controls v8 9.2** — Use DNS Filtering Services](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/9-2-use-dns-filtering-services)
-   [**ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.5.2** — Information security roles and responsibilities](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/iso-27001-2022/a-5-2-information-security-roles-and-responsibilities)
-   [**ISO/IEC 27701:2025 A.3.8** — Identity management](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/iso-27701-2025/a-3-8-identity-management)
-   [**SOC 2 (2017 TSC) CC1.5** — Accountability for Internal Control Responsibilities](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria/cc1-5-accountability-for-internal-control-responsibilities)

## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5

-   [**Control SA-12(14)** — Identity And Traceability](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-12-14-identity-and-traceability)
-   [**Control SA-19(3)** — Component Disposal](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-19-3-component-disposal)
-   [**Control SA-8(14)** — Least Privilege](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-8-14-least-privilege)
-   [**Control SA-8(18)** — Trusted Communications Channels](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-8-18-trusted-communications-channels)
-   [**Control SA-8(32)** — Sufficient Documentation](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-8-32-sufficient-documentation)
-   [**Control SA-23** — Specialization](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sa-23-specialization)

## References

-   [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls)
-   Catalogue identifier: `Control SA-8(9)`

Topics: identity accessidentity managementaccess reviewprivileged access

## Related compliance guidance

- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs.
- [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement.
- [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.
