# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-3(2) — Access And Flow Control Functions

- Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-3-2-access-and-flow-control-functions
- Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › SC — System and Communications Protection
- Last updated: 2026-06-05
- Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com)

**NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `SC-3(2)`·high·Component: **System and Communications Protection**

## What this control requires

> Isolate security functions enforcing access and information flow control from nonsecurity functions and from other security functions. Functions like auditing, intrusion detection, and malware protection may be isolated but remain monitorable. This control supports the Access and Flow Control Isolation Protocol capability within the System and Communications Protection family.
> 
> — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control SC-3(2)

### In plain English

Isolate security functions enforcing access and information flow control from nonsecurity functions and from other security functions. In practice, this means you can prove you access information-level controls on a defined cadence.

## Why it matters

SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed.

This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.

## What an auditor looks for

A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan.

Within **System and Communications Protection**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control SC-3(2)) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.

## How to implement

#### Endpoint Protection

**MDM.** Make MDM enrollment a hard gate for device access (Intune compliance + Conditional Access, or Jamf + Okta device trust). Unmanaged devices simply don't get a session token.

**EDR.** Deploy CrowdStrike / SentinelOne / Defender for Endpoint to every server and laptop; alert on any host that stops sending telemetry for >24h.

### Operational checklist

-   **Access.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Information.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Flow Control.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Security.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Detection.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Scope:** information, information flow control, system, functions, threat, protection, capability, security.

## Evidence to collect

-   **Edr Scan.** `edr_scan` evidence

EDR telemetry (CrowdStrike, Defender for Endpoint) confirms threat detection. Focus: Access And Flow Control Functions.

## Common pitfalls

-   Pilot MDM rollouts that quietly exclude executives or engineers; carving out the highest-risk users is the most common audit failure.

## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5

-   [**Control SI-4(14)** — Wireless Intrusion Detection](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-4-14-wireless-intrusion-detection)
-   [**Control SI-15** — Information Output Filtering](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-15-information-output-filtering)
-   [**Control RA-3(4)** — Predictive Cyber Analytics](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/ra-3-4-predictive-cyber-analytics)
-   [**Control SC-3(1)** — Hardware Separation](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-3-1-hardware-separation)
-   [**Control SC-3(5)** — Layered Structures](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-3-5-layered-structures)
-   [**Control SC-3(4)** — Module Coupling And Cohesiveness](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-3-4-module-coupling-and-cohesiveness)

## References

-   [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls)
-   Catalogue identifier: `Control SC-3(2)`

Topics: governance riskedr xdrendpoint protectionnetwork segmentationthreat intelligence

## Related compliance guidance

- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs.
- [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement.
- [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.