# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-48(1) — Dynamic Relocation Of Sensors Or Monitoring Capabilities

- Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-48-1-dynamic-relocation-of-sensors-or-monitoring-capabilities
- Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › SC — System and Communications Protection
- Last updated: 2026-06-05
- Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com)

**NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `SC-48(1)`·high·Component: **System and Communications Protection**

## What this control requires

> Dynamically relocate sensors and monitoring capabilities to different locations based on predefined conditions or circumstances. This helps ensure the continuous effectiveness of monitoring and prevents adversaries from exploiting fixed monitoring points. This control supports the Dynamic Sensors and Monitoring Systems capability within the System and Communications Protection family.
> 
> — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control SC-48(1)

### In plain English

Dynamically relocate sensors and monitoring capabilities to different locations based on predefined conditions or circumstances. In practice, this means you can prove you policy management-level controls on a defined cadence.

## Why it matters

SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed.

This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.

## What an auditor looks for

A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan.

Within **System and Communications Protection**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control SC-48(1)) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.

## How to implement

#### Code Review Testing

**Pipeline.** Require at least one human reviewer plus passing CI (lint, type, unit, security scan) before merge — protected branches enforce this.

#### Policy Management

**Docs.** Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA.

### Operational checklist

-   **Policy.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Dynamic.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Review.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Protection.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **System.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
-   **Scope:** management, conditions, system, protection, review, capability, systems, policy.

## Evidence to collect

-   **Policy Document.** A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document.

Signed policy or standard documents the safeguard. Focus: Dynamic Relocation Of Sensors Or Monitoring Capabilities.

## Common pitfalls

-   Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced.

## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5

-   [**Control SC-31(1)** — Test Covert Channels For Exploitability](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-31-1-test-covert-channels-for-exploitability)
-   [**Control SC-7(20)** — Dynamic Isolation And Segregation](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-7-20-dynamic-isolation-and-segregation)
-   [**Control SC-45(2)** — Secondary Authoritative Time Source](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-45-2-secondary-authoritative-time-source)
-   [**Control SI-4(9)** — Testing Of Monitoring Tools And Mechanisms](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-4-9-testing-of-monitoring-tools-and-mechanisms)
-   [**Control SC-15(4)** — Explicitly Indicate Current Participants](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-15-4-explicitly-indicate-current-participants)
-   [**Control SC-12(2)** — Symmetric Keys](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-12-2-symmetric-keys)

## References

-   [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls)
-   Catalogue identifier: `Control SC-48(1)`

Topics: logging monitoringcontinuous monitoringcode review testingpolicy management

## Related compliance guidance

- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs.
- [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement.
- [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.