# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7(3) — Access Points - Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-7-3-access-points - Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › SC — System and Communications Protection - Last updated: 2026-06-05 - Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com) **NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `SC-7(3)`·high·Component: **System and Communications Protection** ## What this control requires > Limit external network connections to the system to enhance monitoring of inbound and outbound traffic, especially during protocol transitions (e.g., IPv4 to IPv6), reducing potential access points. This control supports the Network Access Control System capability within the System and Communications Protection family. > > — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control SC-7(3) ### In plain English Limit external network connections to the system to enhance monitoring of inbound and outbound traffic, especially during protocol transitions (e.g., IPv4 to IPv6), reducing potential access points. In practice, this means you can prove you access management-level controls on a defined cadence. ## Why it matters SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed. This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation. ## What an auditor looks for A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan. Within **System and Communications Protection**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control SC-7(3)) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles. ## How to implement 1. Write a short policy stating intent, scope and named owner. 2. Encode it as a platform guardrail — SCP, Azure Policy initiative, Organisation Policy, or repository policy. 3. Wire a monitoring signal that catches drift (CSPM rule, SIEM rule, scheduled query, Workspace alert) and ticket it. 4. Review on a documented cadence and capture the review in the risk register or compliance tracker. ### Operational checklist - **Access.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Network.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Review.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Protection.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Access Control.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Scope:** management, access control, system, e, protection, identity, review, capability. ## Evidence to collect - **Identity Scan.** IAM / IdP exports — Entra ID, Okta, IAM Identity Center, Workspace directory — showing accounts, roles, MFA state and last sign-in. Identity analytics (Okta, SailPoint, Access Analyzer) demonstrates least-privilege. Focus: Access Points. ## How it maps to other frameworks Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit. - [**CIS Controls v8 6.7** — Centralize Access Control](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/cis-controls-v8/6-7-centralize-access-control) - [**NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.13.4** — Information in Shared System Resources](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3/3-13-4-information-in-shared-system-resources) - [**BSI C5:2020 PS-04** — Physical site access control](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/bsi-c5-2020/ps-04-physical-site-access-control) - [**SOC 2 (2017 TSC) CC6.6** — Boundary Protection](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria/cc6-6-boundary-protection) - [**ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.2** — Privileged access rights](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/iso-27001-2022/a-8-2-privileged-access-rights) ## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 - [**Control AC-6(6)** — Privileged Access By Non-Organizational Users](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/ac-6-6-privileged-access-by-non-organizational-users) - [**Control AC-10** — Concurrent Session Control](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/ac-10-concurrent-session-control) - [**Control SC-7(15)** — Networked Privileged Accesses](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-7-15-networked-privileged-accesses) - [**Control AC-5** — Separation Of Duties](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/ac-5-separation-of-duties) - [**Control SC-23** — Session Authenticity](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/sc-23-session-authenticity) - [**Control AC-11** — Device Lock](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/ac-11-device-lock) ## References - [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls) - Catalogue identifier: `Control SC-7(3)` Topics: identity accessidentity managementaccess reviewprivileged accesscontinuous monitoring ## Related compliance guidance - [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs. - [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement. - [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.