# NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SI-10(2) — Review And Resolve Errors - Source: https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-10-2-review-and-resolve-errors - Section: [Compliance](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance) › [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5) › SI — System and Information Integrity - Last updated: 2026-06-05 - Publisher: iCompaas, Inc. (https://www.icompaas.com) **NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5**·Control `SI-10(2)`·high·Component: **System and Information Integrity** ## What this control requires > Review and resolve input validation errors within a defined time period. This involves addressing systemic causes of errors and resubmitting transactions with corrected input. The goal is to ensure that all errors related to the organization-defined information inputs are promptly handled. This control supports the Error Review and Resolution capability within the System and Information Integrity family. > > — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, Control SI-10(2) ### In plain English Review and resolve input validation errors within a defined time period. In practice, this means you can prove you policy management-level controls on a defined cadence. ## Why it matters SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed. This control is rated **high**. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation. ## What an auditor looks for A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan. Within **System and Information Integrity**, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control SI-10(2)) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles. ## How to implement #### Policy Management **Docs.** Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA. ### Operational checklist - **Policy.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Information.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Validation.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Review.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Time.** Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence. - **Scope:** management, information, organization, system, time, review, time period, capability. ## Evidence to collect - **Policy Document.** A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document. Signed policy or standard documents the safeguard. Focus: Review And Resolve Errors. ## Common pitfalls - Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced. ## How it maps to other frameworks Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit. - [**HIPAA (45 CFR Part 164) 164.312(e)(2)(i)** — Transmission Security - Integrity Controls](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/hipaa/164-312-e-2-i-transmission-security-integrity-controls) ## Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 - [**Control SI-10(3)** — Predictable Behavior](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-10-3-predictable-behavior) - [**Control SI-7(16)** — Time Limit On Process Execution Without Supervision](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-7-16-time-limit-on-process-execution-without-supervision) - [**Control SI-10** — Information Input Validation](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-10-information-input-validation) - [**Control SI-2(3)** — Time To Remediate Flaws And Benchmarks For Corrective Actions](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-2-3-time-to-remediate-flaws-and-benchmarks-for-corrective-actions) - [**Control SI-10(1)** — Manual Override Capability](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-10-1-manual-override-capability) - [**Control SI-13(4)** — Standby Component Installation And Notification](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5/si-13-4-standby-component-installation-and-notification) ## References - [NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5](https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/risk-management/sp800-53-controls) - Catalogue identifier: `Control SI-10(2)` Topics: governance riskpolicy management ## Related compliance guidance - [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: a practical implementation guide for cloud teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-53-rev-5): Start with the full NIST SP 800-53 implementation guide — scope, roadmap, evidence and how the assessment runs. - [NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC: a practical guide to protecting CUI in the cloud](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/nist-sp-800-171-rev-3): If your obligation is protecting CUI in your own systems for a federal or defence contract, this derived subset — not the full catalogue — is the requirement. - [SOC 2 compliance: a practical implementation guide for cloud-native SaaS teams](https://support.icompaas.com/compliance/soc-2-trust-services-criteria): Most commercial SaaS already hold a SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP 20x Class A is designed for providers that have one.