AC-23·high·Component: Access ControlWhat this control requires
Employs techniques to detect and prevent unauthorized data mining in data storage objects, protecting sensitive information like PII from extraction. This control supports the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) System capability within the Access Control family.
In plain English
Employs techniques to detect and prevent unauthorized data mining in data storage objects, protecting sensitive information like PII from extraction. In practice, this means you can prove you access management-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed.
This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.
What an auditor looks for
A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan.
Within Access Control, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control AC-23) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Cloud Posture
CSPM. Run Wiz / Prisma / Defender for Cloud / Security Command Center over every account; auto-ticket findings above your accepted-risk threshold.
Configuration Management
Policy-as-code. Codify the control as Service Control Policies (AWS), Azure Policy initiatives, or Organisation Policy (GCP) so the platform enforces what the document promises.
IaC. Gate Terraform / Pulumi / CloudFormation changes with Checkov / tfsec / OPA so misconfigurations never reach production.
Drift. Run a CSPM (Wiz / Prisma / Defender for Cloud / Security Command Center) over every account and route findings to a single risk register.
Network Security
AWS. VPC Flow Logs to S3, default-deny security groups, AWS Network Firewall for north-south, and Transit Gateway for hub-and-spoke segmentation.
Azure. NSGs with deny-by-default, Azure Firewall Premium with TLS inspection, Private Endpoints for PaaS, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud's secure score for drift.
GCP. VPC Service Controls perimeters around sensitive APIs, Cloud NGFW Enterprise for L7 inspection, Private Service Connect for managed services.
Operational checklist
- Access. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Information. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Security. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Configuration. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Data. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: management, access control, information, privacy, system, protection, configuration, capability.
Evidence to collect
- Infra Scan. Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings.
Infrastructure posture tooling (AWS Config, Azure Policy, Nessus) verifies platform hardening. Focus: Data Mining Protection.
Common pitfalls
- Treating CSPM findings as a backlog instead of a hot queue: findings older than the policy SLA accumulate until the auditor asks why.
- Manual cloud-console changes that never make it back to Terraform — drift accumulates until the next outage forces a reconciliation.
- Default-allow egress rules; East-West traffic with no segmentation; jump hosts on the public internet with password auth.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.13.8 — Transmission and Storage Confidentiality
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.5.34 — Privacy and protection of personal identifiable information (PII)
- BSI C5:2020 OPS-14 — Logging and Monitoring - Storage of the Logging Data
Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
- Control AC-16(8) — Association Techniques And Technologies
- Control CP-9(3) — Separate Storage For Critical Information
- Control AC-20(4) — Network Accessible Storage Devices -- Prohibited Use
- Control AC-16 — Security And Privacy Attributes
- Control AC-18(4) — Restrict Configurations By Users
- Control AC-18(3) — Disable Wireless Networking
References
- NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
- Catalogue identifier:
Control AC-23
Topics: data protectioncloud postureconfiguration managementnetwork securityprivacy management