P4.3·high·Component: PrivacyWhat this control requires
Captures, identifies, and flags requests for deletion. Disposes of, destroys, and redacts personal information. Destroys personal information.
In plain English
Captures, identifies, and flags requests for deletion. In practice, this means you can prove you information disposal-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
Every SOC 2 audit opinion is built control-by-control from the Trust Services Criteria. A missing or failing criterion produces an exception in the report, which buyers, partners and procurement teams read line-by-line during vendor reviews.
This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.
What an auditor looks for
A SOC 2 auditor (under AT-C §§ 105/205) tests both design and operating effectiveness over the audit window. For each criterion they expect a written control, a control owner, a population of events, and a sample tested against the population — including remediation tickets for exceptions.
Within Privacy, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Criterion P4.3) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Policy Management
Docs. Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA.
Operational checklist
- Information. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Risk. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Management. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Privacy. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Personal. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: disposal, management.
Evidence to collect
- Policy Document. A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document.
Signed policy or standard documents the safeguard. Focus: Secure Disposal of Personal Information (Original component: Privacy).
Common pitfalls
- Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.5.5 — Contact with authorities
- India DPDP Act 2023 LB-001 — Consent Quality & Management
- GDPR Article 2 — Material Scope
- CIS Controls v8 3.5 — Securely Dispose of Data
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PL-2(3) — Plan And Coordinate With Other Organizational Entities
Related controls in SOC 2 (2017 TSC)
- Criterion P3.2 — Consent Management for Personal Information Collection
- Criterion P4.1 — Limitation of Personal Information Use to Defined Purposes
- Criterion P3.1 — Personal Information Collection Aligned with Privacy Objectives
- Criterion P7.1 — Maintenance of Accurate and Relevant Personal Information
- Criterion P2.1 — Communication of Data Subject Choices and Consequences
- Criterion P8.1 — Inquiry and Complaint Management Process
References
- AICPA / ASEC — SOC 2 (2017 TSC)
- Catalogue identifier:
Criterion P4.3
Topics: governance riskprivacy managementpolicy management