OIS-05·medium·Component: Information Security GovernanceWhat this control requires
Engages with authorities and interest groups to stay informed on threats and vulnerabilities, integrating this information into OIS-06 risk management and OPS-19 vulnerability handling processes to enhance CSP's proactive security posture and protect cloud customer data effectively.
In plain English
Engages with authorities and interest groups to stay informed on threats and vulnerabilities, integrating this information into OIS-06 risk management and OPS-19 vulnerability handling processes to enhance CSP's proactive security posture and protect cloud customer data effectively. In practice, this means you can prove you information management policy-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
BSI C5 is the default cloud-security baseline German public-sector buyers and many DAX-listed enterprises expect; gaps here directly block procurement in the DACH region and frequently appear as must-have items in EU public-tender documents.
What an auditor looks for
A C5 attesting auditor (under ISAE 3000 / IDW PS 860) tests both the design and — for a Type 2 — the operating effectiveness over the attestation period. For each criterion they look for both the Basic and any in-scope Additional objectives.
Within Information Security Governance, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Criterion OIS-05) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Cloud Posture
CSPM. Run Wiz / Prisma / Defender for Cloud / Security Command Center over every account; auto-ticket findings above your accepted-risk threshold.
Vulnerability Management
Scanners. Pair an unauthenticated scanner (Nessus / Qualys / Tenable.io) for external surface with an authenticated agent for OS/library CVEs on every host.
SLA. Document remediation SLAs by CVSS / EPSS: critical 7 days, high 30 days, medium 90 days; report monthly trend to leadership.
Containers. Scan images in CI (Trivy / Grype / Snyk Container) AND at runtime; block deploys on critical findings without exception.
Policy Management
Docs. Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA.
Operational checklist
- Information. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Contact. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Risk. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Security. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Data. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: management policy, cloud customer data.
Evidence to collect
- Policy Document. A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document.
Signed policy or standard documents the safeguard. Focus: Contact with Relevant Government Agencies and Interest Groups.
Common pitfalls
- Treating CSPM findings as a backlog instead of a hot queue: findings older than the policy SLA accumulate until the auditor asks why.
- Scans that hit only the perimeter; missing authenticated scans of OS, runtime libs and base images so most CVEs are invisible.
- Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.8 — Management of technical vulnerabilities
- HIPAA (45 CFR Part 164) 164.308(a)(5)(i) — Security Awareness and Training
- SOC 2 (2017 TSC) CC3.1 — Objective Setting
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.12.1 — Security Assessment
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 AC-4(5) — Embedded Data Types
Related controls in BSI C5:2020
- Criterion OIS-06 — Risk Management Policy
- Criterion SP-03 — Exceptions from Existing Policies and Instructions
- Criterion OPS-18 — Managing Vulnerabilities, Malfunctions and Errors - Concept
- Criterion HR-02 — Employment terms and conditions
- Criterion PI-01 — Documentation and safety of input and output interfaces
- Criterion COM-01 — Identification of applicable legal, regulatory, self-imposed or contractual requirements
References
- Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI) — BSI C5:2020
- Catalogue identifier:
Criterion OIS-05
Topics: governance riskcloud posturevulnerability managementpolicy management