NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 IR-6 — Incident Reporting

What this control requires

Require personnel to report suspected incidents within a defined period to the incident response capability and designated authorities, ensuring compliance with laws and policies. This control supports the Incident Reporting capability within the Incident Response family.

In plain English

Require personnel to report suspected incidents within a defined period to the incident response capability and designated authorities, ensuring compliance with laws and policies. In practice, this means you can prove you response management-level controls on a defined cadence.

Why it matters

SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed.

This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.

What an auditor looks for

A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan.

Within Incident Response, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control IR-6) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.

How to implement

Incident Response

Runbook. Maintain a runbook keyed by incident type with named roles (IC, comms, scribe), an out-of-band comms channel, and a 72-hour timeline for external notification.

Tabletop. Run a quarterly tabletop exercise (ransomware, insider, supply-chain) and feed gaps back into the runbook.

Operational checklist

• Response. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
• Control. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
• Compliance. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
• Change. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
• Incident. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
• Scope: management, personnel, incidents, compliance, capability, incident response capability.

Evidence to collect

• Ticketing Workflow. ticketing_workflow evidence

Workflow metrics (ServiceNow, Jira) show approvals and remediation. Focus: Incident Reporting.

Common pitfalls

• Runbooks that name a role but no person, or list a paging channel that no longer exists.

How it maps to other frameworks

Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.

• NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.6.5 — Incident Response Plan
• SOC 2 (2017 TSC) CC7.4 — Incident Response
• CIS Controls v8 17.8 — Conduct Post-Incident Reviews
• ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.5.27 — Learning from information security incidents
• BSI C5:2020 SIM-03 — Documentation and reporting of security incidents

Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5

• Control IR-4(15) — Public Relations And Reputation Repair
• Control IR-4(11) — Integrated Incident Response Team
• Control IR-6(1) — Automated Reporting
• Control IR-9(2) — Training
• Control IR-7(2) — Coordination With External Providers
• Control IR-8 — Incident Response Plan

References

• NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
• Catalogue identifier: Control IR-6

Topics: incident responsechange management