IR-4(5)·high·Component: Incident ResponseWhat this control requires
Implementing a configurable capability to automatically disable the system upon detecting organization-defined security violations, such as cyber-attacks or critical software errors. This enhances security while considering continuity of operations, using tools like intrusion prevention systems. This control supports the Automated Incident Response Mechanism capability within the Incident Response family.
In plain English
Implementing a configurable capability to automatically disable the system upon detecting organization-defined security violations, such as cyber-attacks or critical software errors. In practice, this means you can prove you disable management-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
SP 800-53 is the catalogue every U.S. federal authorisation (FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC) and most regulated industries point at. A missing control surfaces as a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) item that an Authorizing Official must approve before the Authority To Operate is granted or renewed.
This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.
What an auditor looks for
A 3PAO (FedRAMP) or Independent Assessor (NIST RMF) tests against NIST SP 800-53A assessment procedures. For each control they expect a documented implementation that addresses every assessment objective (Examine, Interview, Test) and an implementation summary in the System Security Plan.
Within Incident Response, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control IR-4(5)) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Incident Response
Runbook. Maintain a runbook keyed by incident type with named roles (IC, comms, scribe), an out-of-band comms channel, and a 72-hour timeline for external notification.
Tabletop. Run a quarterly tabletop exercise (ransomware, insider, supply-chain) and feed gaps back into the runbook.
Business Continuity
BC/DR. Define RTO/RPO per service, test backup restoration quarterly, and run a tabletop of full-region failover annually.
Backups. Immutable backups (S3 Object Lock / Azure immutable storage / GCS bucket lock) plus an air-gapped copy for ransomware resilience.
Operational checklist
- Disable. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Security. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Cyber. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Response. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Configurable. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: management, organization, system, software, capability, operations, cyber attacks, critical software errors.
Evidence to collect
- Ticketing Workflow.
ticketing_workflowevidence
Workflow metrics (ServiceNow, Jira) show approvals and remediation. Focus: Automatic Disabling Of System.
Common pitfalls
- Runbooks that name a role but no person, or list a paging channel that no longer exists.
- DR plans that have never been tested in earnest, or that depend on an MFA token only one person can produce.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
Related controls in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
- Control IR-4(3) — Continuity Of Operations
- Control IR-5(1) — Automated Tracking, Data Collection, And Analysis
- Control IR-4(4) — Information Correlation
- Control IR-2(2) — Automated Training Environments
- Control IR-6(2) — Vulnerabilities Related To Incidents
- Control IR-4(14) — Security Operations Center
References
- NIST Computer Security Resource Center — NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5
- Catalogue identifier:
Control IR-4(5)
Topics: incident responsechange managementbusiness continuity