CIS Controls v8 5.6 — Centralize Account Management

What this control requires

Centralize account management through a directory or identity service.

In plain English

Centralize account management through a directory or identity service. In practice, this means you can prove you centralize account management-level controls on a defined cadence.

Why it matters

The CIS Controls are an industry-vetted, prioritised defence: skipping a safeguard widens the attack surface that the safeguards above and below it assume is closed. Audit frameworks (FedRAMP, PCI DSS, HIPAA) all cite CIS as evidence of due care.

This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.

What an auditor looks for

A CIS-aligned reviewer wants to see (a) which Implementation Group you are targeting, (b) a documented owner for the safeguard, and (c) a tooling or process artefact (config, scan output, ticket) that proves the safeguard runs on the cadence the control demands.

Within Protect, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Control 5.6) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.

How to implement

1. Write a short policy stating intent, scope and named owner.
2. Encode it as a platform guardrail — SCP, Azure Policy initiative, Organisation Policy, or repository policy.
3. Wire a monitoring signal that catches drift (CSPM rule, SIEM rule, scheduled query, Workspace alert) and ticket it.
4. Review on a documented cadence and capture the review in the risk register or compliance tracker.

Operational checklist

• Centralize. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
• Protect. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
• Scope: account management, service, identity management.

Evidence to collect

• Identity Scan. IAM / IdP exports — Entra ID, Okta, IAM Identity Center, Workspace directory — showing accounts, roles, MFA state and last sign-in.
• Infra Scan. Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings.

Identity analytics (Okta, SailPoint, Access Analyzer) demonstrates least-privilege. Focus: Centralize Account Management.

How it maps to other frameworks

Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.

• ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.23 — Web filtering
• ISO/IEC 27701:2025 A.3.8 — Identity management
• SOC 2 (2017 TSC) CC1.5 — Accountability for Internal Control Responsibilities
• NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.13.4 — Information in Shared System Resources
• NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 AC-6(6) — Privileged Access By Non-Organizational Users

Related controls in CIS Controls v8

• Control 9.2 — Use DNS Filtering Services
• Control 6.7 — Centralize Access Control
• Control 6.3 — Require MFA for Externally-Exposed Applications
• Control 6.1 — Establish an Access Granting Process
• Control 6.2 — Establish an Access Revoking Process
• Control 6.6 — Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Authentication and Authorization Systems

References

• Center for Internet Security — CIS Controls v8
• Catalogue identifier: Control 5.6

Topics: identity accessidentity managementaccess reviewprivileged access