A.8.24·high·Component: Technological controlsWhat this control requires
Rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, shall be defined and implemented.
In plain English
Rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, shall be defined and implemented. In practice, this means you can prove you policy management-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
ISO 27001 certification depends on showing each Annex A control is either implemented or explicitly justified for exclusion in the Statement of Applicability (SoA). Certification bodies sample controls during surveillance audits, and a missing SoA entry — or implementation that doesn't match the SoA wording — is a finding.
This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.
What an auditor looks for
An ISO 27001 lead auditor looks for: (1) an SoA entry covering the control with justification, (2) a documented procedure or policy implementing it, (3) records that prove the procedure runs (logs, tickets, training records) and (4) management-review evidence that effectiveness is monitored.
Within Technological controls, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Annex A A.8.24) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Policy Management
Docs. Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA.
Operational checklist
- Policy. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Management. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: management, cryptography, cryptographic key management.
Evidence to collect
- Infra Scan. Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings.
KMS and CSPM reports confirm encryption settings and key rotation meet cryptographic requirements.
Common pitfalls
- Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-12(2) — Symmetric Keys
- SOC 2 (2017 TSC) CC8.1 — Change Management
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.13.11 — Cryptographic Protection
- BSI C5:2020 CRY-01 — Policy for the use of encryption procedures and key management
Related controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Annex A A.8.11 — Data masking
- Annex A A.8.12 — Data leakage prevention
- Annex A A.8.6 — Capacity management
- Annex A A.8.14 — Redundancy of information processing facilities
- Annex A A.8.19 — Installation of software on operational systems
- Annex A A.8.8 — Management of technical vulnerabilities
References
- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 — ISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Catalogue identifier:
Annex A A.8.24
Topics: governance riskkey managementcertificate managementencryption in transitpolicy management