A.8.15·high·Component: Technological controlsWhat this control requires
Logs that record activities, exceptions, faults and other relevant events shall be produced, stored, protected and analysed.
In plain English
Logs that record activities, exceptions, faults and other relevant events shall be produced, stored, protected and analysed. In practice, this means you can prove you policy management-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
ISO 27001 certification depends on showing each Annex A control is either implemented or explicitly justified for exclusion in the Statement of Applicability (SoA). Certification bodies sample controls during surveillance audits, and a missing SoA entry — or implementation that doesn't match the SoA wording — is a finding.
This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.
What an auditor looks for
An ISO 27001 lead auditor looks for: (1) an SoA entry covering the control with justification, (2) a documented procedure or policy implementing it, (3) records that prove the procedure runs (logs, tickets, training records) and (4) management-review evidence that effectiveness is monitored.
Within Technological controls, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Annex A A.8.15) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Logging Monitoring
AWS. Org-trail CloudTrail to a central log archive account, GuardDuty in every region, and Security Hub for cross-source correlation.
Azure. Pipe every diagnostic setting into a central Log Analytics workspace; onboard Microsoft Sentinel for SIEM/SOAR.
GCP. Aggregate audit logs in a dedicated logging project with sink to BigQuery; enable Security Command Center Premium and route findings to Chronicle SIEM.
Policy Management
Docs. Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA.
Operational checklist
- Policy. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Management. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: management.
Evidence to collect
- Infra Scan. Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings.
SIEM ingestion dashboards (Splunk, Sentinel) confirm logging coverage and retention.
Common pitfalls
- Per-account logging that nobody stitches together at the org level — incidents that cross accounts go undetected for days.
- Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.3.4 — Response to Audit Logging Process Failures
- BSI C5:2020 COM-02 — Policy for planning and conducting audits
- SOC 2 (2017 TSC) CC2.3 — External Communication on Internal Control Matters
- CIS Controls v8 8.2 — Collect Audit Logs
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 AU-5(5) — Alternate Audit Logging Capability
Related controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Annex A A.8.11 — Data masking
- Annex A A.8.6 — Capacity management
- Annex A A.8.14 — Redundancy of information processing facilities
- Annex A A.8.19 — Installation of software on operational systems
- Annex A A.8.34 — Protection of information systems during audit testing
- Annex A A.8.8 — Management of technical vulnerabilities
References
- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 — ISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Catalogue identifier:
Annex A A.8.15
Topics: governance risklogging monitoringpolicy management