A.8.9·medium·Component: Technological controlsWhat this control requires
Configurations, including security configurations, of hardware, software, services and networks shall be established, documented, implemented, monitored and reviewed.
In plain English
Configurations, including security configurations, of hardware, software, services and networks shall be established, documented, implemented, monitored and reviewed. In practice, this means you can prove you policy management-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
ISO 27001 certification depends on showing each Annex A control is either implemented or explicitly justified for exclusion in the Statement of Applicability (SoA). Certification bodies sample controls during surveillance audits, and a missing SoA entry — or implementation that doesn't match the SoA wording — is a finding.
What an auditor looks for
An ISO 27001 lead auditor looks for: (1) an SoA entry covering the control with justification, (2) a documented procedure or policy implementing it, (3) records that prove the procedure runs (logs, tickets, training records) and (4) management-review evidence that effectiveness is monitored.
Within Technological controls, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Annex A A.8.9) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Configuration Management
Policy-as-code. Codify the control as Service Control Policies (AWS), Azure Policy initiatives, or Organisation Policy (GCP) so the platform enforces what the document promises.
IaC. Gate Terraform / Pulumi / CloudFormation changes with Checkov / tfsec / OPA so misconfigurations never reach production.
Drift. Run a CSPM (Wiz / Prisma / Defender for Cloud / Security Command Center) over every account and route findings to a single risk register.
Policy Management
Docs. Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA.
Operational checklist
- Policy. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Management. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Security. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Networks. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: management, security, security configurations, hardware, software, services, networks.
Evidence to collect
- Code Repo Scan. Source-control evidence — branch protection, required reviewers, CI status, SCA / SAST reports.
- Infra Scan. Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings.
Infrastructure compliance scanners (AWS Config, Azure Policy) and IaC checks enforce approved configurations.
Common pitfalls
- Manual cloud-console changes that never make it back to Terraform — drift accumulates until the next outage forces a reconciliation.
- Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SA-3(3) — Technology Refresh
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.13.2 — Recategorized as NCO
- HIPAA (45 CFR Part 164) 164.308(a)(5)(i) — Security Awareness and Training
- SOC 2 (2017 TSC) PI1.3 — Processing Controls
- BSI C5:2020 SP-01 — Documentation, communication and provision of policies and instructions
Related controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Annex A A.8.19 — Installation of software on operational systems
- Annex A A.8.13 — Information backup
- Annex A A.8.26 — Application security requirements
- Annex A A.8.22 — Segregation of networks
- Annex A A.8.11 — Data masking
- Annex A A.5.21 — Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
References
- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 — ISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Catalogue identifier:
Annex A A.8.9
Topics: governance riskconfiguration managementpolicy management