A.3.28·high·Component: Security considerationsWhat this control requires
Specify info security requirements related to PII when developing/acquiring applications. Implementation: Define requirements, threat modelling, testing and acceptance criteria. Justification: Ensures applications protect PII by design.
In plain English
Specify info security requirements related to PII when developing/acquiring applications. In practice, this means you can prove you implement application security requirements-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
ISO 27701 is the international way to evidence the GDPR principle of accountability: certified PIMS controls translate directly into the records, contracts and rights-handling that supervisory authorities want, and into the privacy-engineering evidence SOC 2 + Privacy auditors and enterprise procurement teams ask for.
This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.
What an auditor looks for
PIMS auditors expect ISO 27001 to be implemented first and then the 27701-additional controls tested. For PII controllers they look at lawful-basis and rights-handling evidence; for PII processors they look at customer-instructions, sub-processor controls and return/transfer/disposal evidence.
Within Security considerations, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Annex A A.3.28) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Secure Development
Pipeline. Require code review, SAST (Semgrep / Snyk Code), SCA (Dependabot / Renovate), secret-scanning and IaC scanning in the merge pipeline.
Branch protection. Protected branches enforce reviews, signed commits and passing CI before merge; document the protection rules as the control evidence.
Operational checklist
- Implement. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Define. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Ensure. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: application security requirements.
Evidence to collect
- Infra Scan. Continuous infrastructure-posture telemetry — AWS Config, Azure Policy compliance, GCP Organisation Policy, Wiz / Prisma findings.
- Code Repo Scan. Source-control evidence — branch protection, required reviewers, CI status, SCA / SAST reports.
- Policy Document. A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document.
Signed policies, procedures, and registers document the safeguard. Infrastructure posture tooling (AWS/Azure/GCP configuration, encryption, backup, logging) verifies technical enforcement. SDLC and repository gates evidence secure development. Focus: Application security requirements.
Common pitfalls
- CI security checks set to warn-only; the merge button is faster than the security feedback.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- CIS Controls v8 16.9 — Train Developers in Application Security Concepts and Secure Coding
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SA-18(1) — Multiple Phases Of System Development Life Cycle
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.28 — Secure coding
Related controls in ISO/IEC 27701:2025
References
- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 — ISO/IEC 27701:2025
- Catalogue identifier:
Annex A A.3.28
Topics: application securitysecure developmentapi security