A.3.30·high·Component: Security considerationsWhat this control requires
Direct, monitor and review outsourced PII processing system development. Implementation: Contractual requirements, monitoring, code reviews and acceptance tests. Justification: Ensures third-party development meets privacy/security requirements.
In plain English
Direct, monitor and review outsourced PII processing system development. In practice, this means you can prove you implement outsourced development-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
ISO 27701 is the international way to evidence the GDPR principle of accountability: certified PIMS controls translate directly into the records, contracts and rights-handling that supervisory authorities want, and into the privacy-engineering evidence SOC 2 + Privacy auditors and enterprise procurement teams ask for.
This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.
What an auditor looks for
PIMS auditors expect ISO 27001 to be implemented first and then the 27701-additional controls tested. For PII controllers they look at lawful-basis and rights-handling evidence; for PII processors they look at customer-instructions, sub-processor controls and return/transfer/disposal evidence.
Within Security considerations, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Annex A A.3.30) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Secure Development
Pipeline. Require code review, SAST (Semgrep / Snyk Code), SCA (Dependabot / Renovate), secret-scanning and IaC scanning in the merge pipeline.
Branch protection. Protected branches enforce reviews, signed commits and passing CI before merge; document the protection rules as the control evidence.
Operational checklist
- Implement. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Ensure. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Monitor. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: outsourced development.
Evidence to collect
- Vendor Risk Management.
vendor_risk_managementevidence - Policy Document. A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document.
Signed policies, procedures, and registers document the safeguard. Processor due diligence, contracts, and disclosure registers evidence third-party controls. Focus: Outsourced development.
Common pitfalls
- CI security checks set to warn-only; the merge button is faster than the security feedback.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.8.30 — Outsourced development
- CIS Controls v8 16.4 — Establish and Manage an Inventory of Third-Party Software Components
- NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 3.16.2 — Unsupported System Components
- BSI C5:2020 DEV-08 — Version Control
Related controls in ISO/IEC 27701:2025
- Annex A A.3.27 — Secure development life cycle
- Annex A A.3.10 — Supplier agreements
- Annex A A.3.31 — Test information
- Annex A A.3.28 — Application security requirements
References
- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 — ISO/IEC 27701:2025
- Catalogue identifier:
Annex A A.3.30
Topics: secure developmentvendor riskvendor management