A.2.3·high·Component: Organizational controlsWhat this control requires
AI-related policies shall be aligned with existing organizational policies, objectives, and governance commitments.
In plain English
AI-related policies shall be aligned with existing organizational policies, objectives, and governance commitments. In practice, this means you can prove you govern policies-level controls on a defined cadence.
Why it matters
ISO 42001 is the first audited evidence regulators, customers and investors can ask for that you are managing AI risk. Each Annex A control is a check-box in that audit; it is also the management system enterprises are starting to require from AI vendors before an MSA can be signed.
This control is rated high. Auditors expect a named owner, a remediation SLA, and a tooling artefact that evidences continuous operation.
What an auditor looks for
An ISO 42001 auditor verifies you have an AI policy, a risk-based system of impact assessments for each AI system, lifecycle controls from data acquisition through retirement, and third-party-AI controls that pierce the vendor's wrapper to underlying model behaviour.
Within Organizational controls, the assessor will trace your implementation back to the catalogue reference (Annex A A.2.3) and look for objective evidence on the latest two assessment cycles.
How to implement
Policy Management
Docs. Keep each policy in version-controlled Markdown alongside the code that implements it; ship a signed PDF snapshot at each annual review and link the SHA into the SoA.
Operational checklist
- Govern. Document the trigger, the owner and the cadence.
- Scope: policies, governance.
Evidence to collect
- Policy Document. A signed and version-controlled policy / standard / procedure document.
Approved AI governance policies and related corporate policies evidence alignment between AI objectives, organizational obligations, and governance commitments. Evidence should demonstrate cross-reference, approval, and maintenance of policy alignment. Focus: Alignment with other organizational policies.
Common pitfalls
- Policies that no engineer has read; the version in Confluence drifts from the version that's actually being enforced.
How it maps to other frameworks
Computed from shared tags, control component and key-operation subjects — handy when you are reconciling controls across an audit.
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 A.5.5 — Contact with authorities
- ISO/IEC 27701:2025 A.3.3 — Information security policies
- CIS Controls v8 2.6 — Allowlist Authorized Libraries
- SOC 2 (2017 TSC) CC2.3 — External Communication on Internal Control Matters
- GDPR Article 83 — General conditions for imposing administrative fines
Related controls in ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- Annex A A.2.2 — Policies for the responsible development or use of AI systems
- Annex A A.2.4 — Review of policies for responsible AI
- Annex A A.9.3 — Objectives for responsible use of AI systems
- Annex A A.5.3 — Documentation of AI system impact assessments
- Annex A A.5.5 — Assessment of societal impact
- Annex A A.3.2 — AI roles and responsibilities
References
- ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 — ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- Catalogue identifier:
Annex A A.2.3
Topics: governance riskpolicy management